This will in reality never be an issue with this framework; Sir John de- Keith d

This will in reality never be an issue with this framework; Sir John de- Keith d

Re: ? Comyn partner out-of Malise

About the Comyn child who was simply wife out of Malise off Strathearn, I had theorized inside 2005 one to she was indeed Margaret, defined as partner regarding Sir John de- Keith (get a hold of copy off post lower than) who was 2ndly age are supplied for the reason that article: new wife Emma I recommend is of another family unit members, rather than mother of your second Earl Malise.

Scots Peerage, sub _Comyn, Earl regarding Buchan_ , claims in part, ‘Malise, Earl regarding Strathearn, had a partner Emma, in 1261-1267, whoever surname was unfamiliar ‘[SP II:256, alludes to Cal. regarding Docs., we. 2383, 2451]. a while ahead of 1270, to ensure his widow (Margaret) would have been “available” some time immediately after Emma.

It was obviously a speculation; it does feel the benefit of coping with a well-known matchmaking anywhere between Muriel Keith and you can Reginald le Cheyne. Any longer associated documentation manage obviously end up being anticipate.

Brand new account during the Scots Peerage in regards to the group of Keith claims out of Sir John de Keith (d. ca. 1270) which he is actually believed to have hitched Comyn, earl out-of Buchan . It identification, of the not sure (“thought to have been”) variety, can be fixed according to the following dispensation, dated at the Fondi to your 14 Jan 1378/9::

‘ Reg Aven 215, fifty To your bishop of Moray. Faculty so you can dispense Reginald Cheyn, donzel, and Murielle, damselle, d de- Keth, from Moray and you can Aberdeen dioceses, about impediment to help you relationships as a result of the next and fourth degrees of consanguinity. Fondi, 19 Kal. Feb., anno step 1. SRO Vat. Trans., iv, no. 46. ‘

Muriel Keith, the long term 2nd partner from Robert Stewart, 1st Duke off Albany (d. 1420), is actually contracted so you’re able to get married Reginald ce Cheyne, son of Sir Reginald le Cheyne by the his partner (while the their earliest partner), Helen away from Strathearn. While you are you can find well known openings throughout the ancestry off Muriel Keith, she and you will Reginald ce Cheyne carry out share a lineage from the Comyns. not, this might be too faraway to require good dispensation in the event that Muriel is actually good-great-higher grandd Comyn, Earl off Buchan (d. 1233), which would end up being the situation if is the reason child.

dos. Reginald ce Cheyne try an excellent-grandson out-of Marjory Comyn, daughter off Alexander Comyn, Earl regarding Buchan (d. 1290), son regarding William Comyn in the list above. Their own young buck was Malise, Earl of Strathearn out-of 1312 so you’re able to his death for the 1328 , and you may pops out-of Reginald.

ca. 1270), is identical to Marjory Comyn, and you can married 2ndly to Malise, Earl from Strathearn (d. 1312). This would mean the newest parentage a€?said to have been’ that Margaret, spouse out of Sir John de Keith, was of that generation: she’d n’t have started the newest d Comyn, Earl of Buchan, but instead from their young buck Alexander. There isn’t any facts you to definitely Earl Malise and you may Marjory Comyn was basically hitched far before 1275: once the Lindsay had written,

You will find one to postbrudar bolivia discernable base on which the relationship between Reginald le Cheyne and you can Muriel Keith will have stayed: in the event the Margaret Comyn, partner out of Sir John de Keith (d

‘ The spouse associated with earl, regarding the 1275, try entitled Marjory, while we understand the attesting term off Zero. cv., and that’s mentioned of the Wyntoun, Publication VIII. chap. vi., having come the second sis away from John Comyn, Earl out-of Buchan, exactly who negotiated on the part of Earl Malise the wedding settlement over said [dated at the London, April 26, 1293 getting their child Matilda and Robert de Tony, young buck off Ralph].’

Alexander Comyn = Elizabeth de- Quincy E regarding Buchan We __________________I________________ We III step one) Sir John = Marjory = 2) Malise de- Keith I (als We Elizabeth of Strathearn . 1270 I Margaret) I d. 1312 _____________I__ ___I__________________________ We I We I We I Sir William Bernard Malise Gilbert Robert Maud de Keith de Keith Elizabeth of = Robert d. bef 1293 Strathearn; d. 1328 de Tony I ______I_______________________ I We I We Sir Edward Malise Mary Helen = Isabella de- E of Strathearn = 1) Sir Reginald Synton d. california. 1343 We le Cheyne We I We = 2) Sir David We V We We de- Graham Sir William de- We We__________ Keith I I = Margaret Fraser __________________I_______ V __I_____________ I I I III We We I We Muriel + Reginald Mary Mariota Keith ce Cheyne (= Robert Stewart, Duke regarding Albany)

Join the ConversationLeave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *